Tag Archives: curvy

Body Positive

New piece up at Role/Reboot this morning on why body positivity, an idea I’m 100% in favor of, doesn’t jibe with all this “real women have curves” b.s. While I agree that fat people face discrimination, harassment and scorn, and that that needs to stop immediately, disputing the “realness” of other women (thin, muscular, flat-chested, trans, etc) is the wrong way to get there.

Relatedly, I have a new favorite line on this subject from Germaine Greer: ”The body reasonably healthy and clean is the body beautiful.”

Related Post: My Role/Reboot piece on period sex.

Related Post: How the internet ad culture creates some seriously mixed messages.

3 Comments

Filed under Body Image, Republished!

Female figures are, by definition, “feminine.”

Let’s take a break from our regularly scheduled rape programming today and talk about something else. Back with more rape news, rape commentary, rape apology, rape debate, and legitimate/forcible/date/stranger/marital (and more!) rape next week.

Is Serena Williams a bombshell or what?

Via Huffington Post

I love Serena Williams. When I play tennis, I literally pretend I’m her and I placebo-effect myself into being better at tennis. When I catch a glimpse of myself in the mirror and my butt looks enormous, I channel her. Her big butt is the product of genetics and incredible effort and fitness and I smile at myself because my big butt is the product of genetics and (slightly less) exercise and fitness (and also cupcakes and pasta, but those are fabulous things too).

The Huffington Post headline with the bombshell pic was this:

Serena Williams’ Tight Dress Shows Off Her Feminine Figure

The dictionary definition of “feminine” is “pertaining to a woman or a girl,” but what do we mean when refer to a “feminine” figure? We usually mean voluptuous, right? Large breasts, hourglass shape, round hips. We think curves. We think Kim Kardashian, Venus de Milo, Sofia Vergara, Jessica Rabbit. We think va va voom, hubba hubba, and men yelling out SUV windows with raunchier iterations of “damn, girl!”

But which women are we willing to say have unfeminine figures? Flat-chested women? Narrow-hipped woman? Thin women? muscular woman? Trans women? Obese women? These all sound like women with figures that are “pertaining to a woman or a girl,” no?

New York Times Magazine

Here’s another picture of Serena Williams with her sister Venus on the cover of the New York Times Magazine (side note: The profile is good too). Same woman, same figure, but I doubt that most people, including the HuffPo titler, would describe her figure as feminine in this picture. Powerful. Strong. Ripped. Awesome. Inspiring. Probably not “feminine.”

Some bodies are curvy, some are not. Some have breasts, some do not. Some will bear children, some will not. Some will win Grand Slams, most will not. But female bodies are all, by definition, feminine.

Related Post: Does Kim Kardashian widen the spectrum of “acceptable” body types?

Related Post: Curve Appeal and American Apparel’s Next Big Thing contest.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Body Image, Gender, Hollywood, Media, Sports

Mixed Messaging

One of the nice things about having your own blog is that nobody but you controls the headlines, images, captions, or advertising. The downside, of course, is that your only readers are the ones that find their way to your little corner of the internet. And so, sometimes we make tradeoffs, in the name of expanded readership.

Here is an article I wrote for Minerva Place, that online lady mag I mentioned a few weeks ago. When I submitted the piece, I called it “Curvy Girl Dating,” or some such nonsense. The piece got retitled “Real Women Have Curves.” Oy! How embarassing! The concept of “real” womanhood is one I have railed against time and again. The idea that body shape is what makes us “real” women is my least favorite and the laziest trope of the body positive movements. Real women are skinny and fat and voluptuous and svelte and flat-chested and pear-shaped and tall and short and blah blah blah. You know the drill.

And yet, there it is, right above my byline.

What’s more, the ads surrounding my piece (which is about body acceptance and body positivity…) are weight-loss ads. Double oy. When you give your writing to other people to share, you give up some serious contextual control. Online ads are often keyword triggered, which leads to some very confusing ad/article pairings. Love your body! Get rid of your fat! Everybody is different and it’s beautiful! Look like the people on magazines! Mixed messaging much?

What do you think? Is it worth trying to reach a new target audience when you sacrifice some of the decision-making power to people (or automated ad generators) who may not be on the same page?

Related Post: Curve Appeal vs. American Apparel’s Next Big Thing contest

Related Post: Tyra Banks thinks calling plus size women “fiercely real” is a good thing…

Related Post: One gentleman didn’t think I “sounded” curvy on an online dating profile.

9 Comments

Filed under Advertising, Body Image, Republished!

Guest Post: Telling Someone to Eat More Is Just as Rude as Telling Someone to Eat Less

Image: Lezparados Paradise (http://lezparadosparadise.tumblr.com)

Remember that awesome guest post from Kate about Cosmo, kink, and sexual honesty? She’s back! I’ve been writing about body image a lot lately, and how much I hate comments that begin with “real women have…” The bulk of this commentary is directed towards women with “less ideal” bodies, as if to make them feel better about themselves. Kate wrote a great response about how women who have traditionally “ideal” bodies still have good reason to resent the body scrutiny.

*      *       *       *       *

I’m 5’6’’ and I weigh 130 pounds on a good day. I end up being a size 2 or 4, depending on where I shop, and I’ve been told I have the elusive combo of a flat stomach and sizable boobs. I like who I am physically. I feel that I am healthy and beautiful.  All of these measures are, of course, subjective, and determined by where and when we live. A century ago, for example, I would probably not have been looked at in such a positive light, as my hips are pretty narrow–not good for child-bearing, you know.

These days, there’s a lot of awareness about how we need to have more realistic depictions in the media for girls (and boys) to look up to and I definitely agree. I think that many young adults have unreasonable visions of what they should look like as they’re growing up. I know I did. I felt my boobs were too big, or my thighs too wide, and I didn’t feel comfortable in my own skin until after college when I learned how to use clothes to accentuate the parts of me that I feel are the best.

Now that I’m older, and I’ve learned how to dress well and carry myself with confidence, I get a lot of comments about my figure. I get it at work, where people tell me to eat more. I get it at home, from my family, who say I’m too “skinny.” While some people might view those as compliments, or just jealousy, I don’t think it’s polite or even necessary. If I ever told somebody they were a little too chubby around their waistline or that they should eat less, that would be ridiculously inappropriate. Why is it okay because I’m a size 4? When I do try to dissuade comments of that sort, I’m told to either let it roll of my back, or be flattered.

Making comments about anyone’s body type is, in the long run, very against what we should be trying to accomplish as a culture. Our obsession with cementing the “you’re beautiful just the way you are” view needs to extend to everybody, not just those who don’t possess the “ideal” of the moment.  I should be able to be just as proud of my physical appearance as somebody who has bigger hips or is taller or has some little love handles.  And I should be able to just be who I am, no comments necessary, thanks.

*      *       *       *       *

Related Post: Amber Rose, Media Takeout and “good thick” vs. “bad thick.”

Related Post: If we buy into this idea of “ideals” at all (which we don’t), they aren’t necessarily what you were expecting!

2 Comments

Filed under Body Image, Guest Posts

Curve Appeal vs. American Apparel’s “Next Big Thing” Contest

This is the picture I keep meaning to submit to Curve Appeal... except my technologically incapable self can't find the "Submit" Button. Sigh.

Today, I found a Tumblr called Curve Appeal that fits with yesterday’s theme of un-retouched photos of women’s bodies*. On it, women and girls post pictures of themselves and include anecdotal notes about their figures (“I’m finally starting to realize that I don’t have to be a size 0 to be fashionable”) or quantitative data about their measurements. The creator writes, “I think it is so important for girls and women to have a realistic point of reference to look up to!” I couldn’t agree more; realistic points of reference in the media are few and far between.

At the moment, there’s a number of submissions from girls who are competing in the plus-size model competition for American Apparel, which I do NOT appreciate nearly as much. I don’t blame them for wanting to be publicly recognized as attractive. After all, it’s an acknowledgment that lots of larger women don’t get on a regular basis. That being said, I really don’t like the ranking/rating system of the American Apparel contest. Pitting body vs. body is good for no one. Also, their press release was insulting and full of terrible puns (and I usually love terrible puns).

Each of the American Apparel contestants gets to post a little blurb about themselves. There are tons along the lines of “Real women have curves!” Again, I get that this is coming from the desire to attach positivity to something that is often treated with disdain or disrespect, but there is no more “real” body type than any other. Attaching femininity to a particular body part does nobody any good. Why do we have to undermine other bodies to make us feel good about our own? Real women have bodies. That’s about as much as I’m willing to say.

*Curve Appeal also includes photos of plus-size models from catalogs and runways. I don’t think this diminishes the value of the rest of the non-airbrushed photos.

Related Post: Tyra calls plus-size models “fiercely real.” What?

Related Post: Phoenix Marie before and after make-up. Which do you like better?

14 Comments

Filed under Body Image

Dreams DO Come True

*GMP article about age gaps, Ramen, and internet formulas is up, but I will tell you about it tomorrow.*

Boy, oh boy, today I am peeing-in-my-pants gleeful about this post. Do you remember Virginia who writes at Beauty Schooled and Never Say Diet? I wrote about her here, and here, and here. She covers beauty culture, body image, health news and all things fascinating with sharp wit and insightful commentary. I have a big, fat blogger crush on her.

Today, in things-I-have-been-wanting-to-say-forever, I’m guest blogging over at Beauty Schooled:

From my online profile

“I’m online dating (pause for commiserative laughter) and last week, I received a lovely note from a potential suitor. He addressed things we had in common, complimented various portions of my profile, and concluded with this: Anyways, you do not strike me as someone who is curvy…would be nice to chat soon. Wait…what? You were doing so well! Let me get this straight, based on a written profile, I do not “strike” this guy as “someone who is curvy.” Hmm… let’s investigate.”

Read the rest at Beauty Schooled!

Related Post: I wrote a body-positive guest post for Emilie’s blog I Came to Run.

Related Post: I totally agreed with Virginia on this No Skinnies Allowed yoga.

1 Comment

Filed under Body Image, Republished!

“Curvy”/”Skinny”: Sex Drive vs. Confidence

Whether you’re into online dating or not, the OKCupid Blog OkTrends should be on everybody’s must-read list. OkTrends makes up for its sparse posting schedule with amazing content analyzing the messages, preferences, habits and opinions of 1,000,000+ users. Among the latest charts to come from this goldmine of human behavior:

First, clarifying our terms: Green represents women who self-identify as “skinny” (note: this is distinctive from “thin,” a different self-reported category), and yellow is the self-identified “curvy” group (distinct from “a little extra” or “full-figured”). Yellow is a bigger dot to reflect the larger pool of women.

This graph correlates sex-drive and self-confidence across time for these two groups of women:

  • At 18: Skinny women have slightly above average self-confidence, but slightly below average sex drive, while curvy women are exactly the reverse, slightly low self-esteem, slightly high sex drive.
  • At 30: Both groups are reasonably self-confident, but the sex-drive of the curvy women is twice as high.
  • At 40: Curvy women are more confident with higher sex drives, a stasis that remains until both groups’ sex drives tank by 60.

Does this mean that curvy women are better in bed or like sex more? No. As OkTrends points out, “Curvy, as a word, has the strongest sensual overtones of all our self-descriptions. So we’re getting a little insight into the real-world implications of a label.” So basically, it comes down to choosing your label. Women who pick “curvy” among the myriad of similar labels will likely also have above-average sex drives. We’ve got correlation but not causation.

Here’s my theory: There’s evidence that links self-esteem and body confidence to better/more satisfying sex. This makes intuitive sense to me, fewer body hang-ups = willingness to look silly = open to experimentation  = higher likelihood of enjoyment = wanting to do it more. I think the selection of “curvy” over the other label choices and higher sex drive are both consequences of the a third variable… basic body confidence.

Related Post: More linguistic play around the “plus size” demographic. Thanks Tyra!

Related Post: See, body confidence is hot as hell!

Related Post: More thoughts on online dating. Who pays? And does it matter? (yes)

6 Comments

Filed under Body Image, Really Good Writing by Other People, Sex

Tyra Says “Fiercely Real,” I Say Knock It Off

Kasia (image: http://www.cwtv.com)

This is Kasia. She is the latest plus-size model to make the ranks of Tyra Banks’ ego trip (aka America’s Next Top Model cycle 16).

For all her preaching about healthy eating and respecting variations of women besides thin, skinny, lean and lanky, Tyra has some severely confused notions about health and body image. She lectures the contestants on nutrition and then promptly goes batshit crazy over the girl with the tiniest waist.

My latest beef with Ty-Ty is semantic in nature. I think it’s cool that she includes plus-size models (even if “plus” means 8 and even if some of them may have been straight-size models that Tyra convinced to gain weight….) But then, this season, while describing Kasia to her fellow judges, she dismissed the term “plus-size” in favor of a new Tyraism, “fiercely real.”

Aiiii, Tyra! Why do you do this! Women with “curves” are no more “real” than women without curves. That attitude, while pervasive in some communities of body-image writers, is so dangerous. It just shifts ideals from one size to another, missing the point entirely. Women (and men) are shaped differently. Being heavy or slight, tall or short, curvy or straight… these are not indicators of “realness,” but indicators of genetic variation.

Putting pressure on naturally thin girls to be curvier or “more womanly” (another irritating lingustic turn) is as unhelpful as pressuring big women to be skinny. It’s the same mentality that tells flat-chested women that there’s something wrong with them or flat-butted girls that they need a booty to be sexy.

Why does Kasia have to be the “fiercely real” one? Why can’t she just be another model competing in an overblown pageant in which none of the participants will likely see any success?

Bonus: “Fiercely real” or not, Kasia was featured in V Magazine:

Kasia in V Magzine

Related Post: What do you say when people you think are awesome and totally cool tell you about their plastic surgery plans?

Related Post: Sociological Images has an interesting example of changing ideals.

9 Comments

Filed under Body Image, Gender, Hollywood, Media