Tag Archives: Game of Thrones

Three Strikes, Newsroom, Three Strikes

Three episodes is the standard hook-me-or-I’m-out window I give new shows. That’s about all the time I’m willing to spare for something unproven. My attention span shrinks by the day, but some of my favorites, old and new (The Wire, Girls), took more than the first 8 seconds to convince of their merit.

Last night, I hit the three-episode mark with Aaron Sorkin’s The Newsroom, and ladies and gentlemen, the jig is officially up. It’s not that the show is irredeemable, it’s just that my time is better spent on Next Food Network Star. Yes, The Newsroom is that bad.

There are many problems included but not limited to epically long and boring monologues, terrible musical selections, a distorted nostalgia for a past that doesn’t exist, and not a single likeable persona among the bunch. But the biggest problem, which I’m not the first to note, is Sorkin’s attitude towards The Women.

In the world of The Newsroom, women are shrill, spastic, pathetic, manic, melodramatic, jealous, petty, technologically incompetent, unprofessional, obsessive, preoccupied with “saving” men, frantic, disorganized, bossy, irritable, and above all, frazzled and desperate. They exist as two-dimensional paper dolls onto which the men can project their opinions and reinforce their own (admittedly limited) identities.

After I finished episode 3 last night, I returned to Season 1 of Friday Night Lights, which I have been rewatching because I miss the Taylors and summer sucks for television. This is how emotional drama about the American experience is done. The character that would be the easiest to pigeon-hole, the sweet and sassy coach’s wife, is as robust and multi-faceted as the rest (a credit both to the writer and the insanely talented Connie Britton).

I’ve talked about this before regarding Game of Thrones and I’m going to quote myself, because today I’m just that cool:

Despite the confines of their societal roles, the women and girls in Game of Thrones have lives as ethically complex and emotionally difficult as the knights and swordsmen. The roles of wife, mother, sister, daughter are never one-note labels, but mere pieces of very nuanced portraits of human life. Just because these characters are limited by the inequality of their environment doesn’t make their stories any less rewarding.

This is a lesson Aaron Sorkin seems to be forgetting. In the most recent episode, the nervous, manic Maggie suffered a panic attack, from which the heroic Jim rescued her. The panic attack could have been a window into Maggie’s mind and experience, instead it was used to showcase Jim’s skill and to teach us about his history as a reporter embedded with troops.

Sorkin has already chosen which characters he finds independently interesting, and surprise of all surprises, they look a lot like him.

Related Post: White guy, white girl, non-white guy, how to fake diversity on television.

Related Post: Some characters from West Wing will always be my favorites.

2 Comments

Filed under Art, Gender, Hollywood, Media

Sunday Scraps 59

1. WEIGHT: Michelle Obama takes a rare misstep with her support of The Biggest Loser. Ragen Chastain and Virginia Sole-Smith (Beauty Schooled) explain why.

2. KICK: New York Times has a kick-ass interactive graphic mapping the fundraising efforts of kickstarter drives over the last three years. What gets funded, and why?

3. GAY: Comedian Rob Delaney explains where homophobia comes from, and it isn’t pretty.

4. THRONES: My writer crush Emily Nussbaum at The New Yorker covers Game of Thrones in all its nude, violent glory and explains why patriarchy, in Westeros and L.A. both, is what it’s really all about.

5. FOOD: Besides Guy Fieri, have any winners of The Next Food Network Star done squat with their title? NYMag breaks it down.

6. PSYCH: Fabulous, fascinating, chilling article in the New York Times Magazine about recent studies in psychopathy in children. At what age can we detect a future psychopath, what does it mean, and what can we do about it?

Related Post: Sunday 58: Alison Bechdel, boy-free prom, 10 most read books

Related Post: Sunday 57: nudity in Central park, David Brooks on higher ed, child stars

2 Comments

Filed under Body Image, Food, Hollywood, Media, Politics, Really Good Writing by Other People

S(Monday) Scraps 54

1. TRAYVON: Ugh. When NBC mixes and matches the 911 Trayvon Martin call to make George Zimmerman sound more racist, they do no one any favors. From Mother Jones.

2. BOOKS: Slate ponders what, if anything, we lose when scoping out perspective partners now that our reading material can be hidden behind kindle cases instead of on shelves for all to peruse and judge?

3. ADVERTISING: Use this Gendered Advertising Remixer to compile a pink or blue themed advertising onslaught all your own.

4. DINKLAGE: Everybody’s favorite Game of Thrones schemer is played by the small-statured actor Peter Dinklage. NYT profiles his rise to fame and his avoidance of all roles elfin.

5. YOGA: This man would like to sell you his used yoga mat, but he will tell you, in excruciating detail, how he tried to use it first.

6. SEXUAL VIOLENCE: Harper’s Magazine chronicles the astonishingly high rates of sexual violence on Native American reservations, and the appallingly lackluster responses that victims get from local, state, and federal law enforcement.

Related Post: Sunday 53 = Romans vs. the U.S. Military, nail art, the history of Bi-Rite

Related Post: Sunday 52 = Robert Bayles, taking the SAT at 35, what do you teach black children?

1 Comment

Filed under Books, Media

When You Turn the Last Page

When was the last time you were head over heels in love with a book? Most recently for me, Game of Thrones had me in its thrall for a solid two months (come on! It’s 5,000 pages!), and before that, I couldn’t put down Mary Karr’s Lit.

The one and only time I’ve ever purchased an actual porn DVD–I promise, this is related–it was because the Fleshbot reviewer wrote this (link NSFW):

“When I read the seventh Harry Potter book, I was so excited I immediately called my then-boyfriend and forced him to listen to me recite the entire plot from memory. (I realize now that that was more than a little crazy.) That’s how I feel about this movie. I want to call everyone I know and tell them every single thing that happened in every scene, from interview to orgasm. It’s that good.”

So I bought it. Did I like it? Yes, but this is not a post about porn. This is a post about that kind of mania the reviewer describes, where you try to relive the joy of a particular book by forcing everyone you know to love it too. There’s the initial pleasure of reading it yourself, and then after the experience is over, there are all the weird, vicarious ways you try to get at that initial sensation.

I read reviews of books after I turn the last page. I read all those pages of praise that publishers stack at the beginning. Sometimes, I go back and read the first few pages again just to remember how it all started. I read interviews with the author to see what layers I can add to the experience. Sometimes, I draw crazy maps of the characters. And sometimes, depending on the book, I make the people I love listen to me talk about it for aaaaaages. They are very nice people, and only rarely tell me to shut up.

I’m halfway through David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas, and I’m in the moony-eyed, swooning, delirious phase of infatuation. I pull my face out of it when I get off the train, and it’s like a cartoon fade-away as Mitchell’s world recedes and the train platform comes into focus.

The book is built like a boomerang though time, or so says the book jacket. It begins in 1850, rockets through six separate stories related by the thinnest of narrative threads, peaks well in the future, and then ricochets backwards through the same six stories in reverse order. Each chapter is so uniquely intricate and wholly realized, I would happily read six separate novels.

Related Post: How to keep your daughter from becoming Bella.

Related Post: Tigers and Grandparents.

3 Comments

Filed under Books

Badass Ladies on the TV

Today I’m over at Persephone Magazine (check out their kick-ass new layout!) listing some of the coolest characters on TV in 2011. Forgive me, New Year’s makes my list-making affinity go berserk. I picked my faves, but despite an intense, damn near pathological devotion to the tube, I don’t watch everything. Who did I miss?

Related Post: Last time on Persephone, I did the 5-book challenge.

Related Post: Here’s my Persephone piece, “How to Ace an Interview.”

1 Comment

Filed under Gender, Hollywood, Media, Republished!

Game of Thrones vs. The Wire

I’m halfway through Book 2 of the Game of Thrones series (now on HBO for those allergic to words), and I’m finding myself as addicted to the Seven Kingdoms as I’ve ever been to a fictional world (and that includes Hogwarts). They are sprawling and epic and complicated and emotional and fascinating and… do you see how I just keep adding adjectives?

Arya Stark, Daenerys, Queen Cersei

The thing I like about them the most, of course, is George R.R. Martin’s approach to gender. I’m about to attempt a long-shot of a comparison, so bear with me and I’m hoping it will all make sense in the end. Here it goes:

I love The Wire for a million reasons, but that show was a virtual wasteland for female characters. If you look at HBO’s obscenely long cast list, barely 10% of the characters are women. When writing a show about the Baltimore drug wars, the writers cherry-picked which stories to highlight and those were almost all male-centered.

You might point out that most drug dealers and cops in Baltimore are men, and you’d be right. But, in the fully formed world that The Wire attempts to create, women do exist, and they exist in equal number. They are the mothers, sisters, wives, girlfriends, addicts, teachers, etc. who populate the periphery of the cast. For whatever combination of reasons, the writers did not find their stories to be as compelling as those of the men. A landscape as vast and rich as The Wire‘s could have documented the stories of men and women. Cutty’s teacher ex-girlfriend, Avon’s sister, McNulty’s ex-wife, Nick’s baby mama, and Randy’s foster mother could have added incredible depth to David Simon’s big picture.

Back to Game of Thrones. The women in medieval-esque Seven Kingdoms are predominantly relegated to roles of wife and mother (and occasionally prostitute). Much like The Wire, the action-sequences are male-dominated, by the nature of what constitutes “action” (drug dealing and battles). Structurally speaking, however, Martin spends as much time with the women as he does with the gallivanting knights. Why? Because they’re fascinating.

Despite the confines of their societal roles, the women and girls in Game of Thrones have lives as ethically complex and emotionally difficult as the knights and swordsmen. The roles of wife, mother, sister, daughter are never one-note labels, but mere pieces of very nuanced portraits of human life. Just because these characters are limited by the inequality of their environment doesn’t make their stories any less rewarding.

That narrative balance is what allows Game of Thrones to pack the punch that it does. The world is so deep because Martin has added layers to every character, not just the ones with swords.

Related Post: Highbrow books in a lowbrow world.

Related Post: A three-question interview with Megan McCafferty (author of Sloppy Firsts)

10 Comments

Filed under Books, Gender, Hollywood, Media, Really Good Writing by Other People