Tag Archives: princess culture

“Your body will get the recognition it deserves”

After yesterday’s post about my dislike for aesthetically-based gym marketing, my friend Kim (who is awesome, follow her here) sent me this advertisement for barre classes in Tennessee.

Check out that last line one more time: “You might not get to wear a crown, but your body will get the recognition it deserves.” Let’s parse that, shall we?

1. Wearing a crown is something to be celebrated: I could write a whole other post about beauty pageants, but I’ll save that for another time. Regardless of how you feel about pageantry, note here that the structure of this sentence implies that the goal is not to succeed in the competition, but to literally wear the sparkly thing. This is the adult version of princess culture.

2. Your body, not you, will get recognition: If we grant that a beauty pageant has additional, non-aesthetic components (i.e. community service, leadership, etc), then why is your body the thing that we are recognizing? The personification of “the body” as something different than a component of your multi-faceted self is a dangerous way of reducing you to your “useful” parts, and the parts of you that are still useful are the parts that fit into a bikini.

3. Bodies deserve recognition: Bodies are for being looked at by other people. Bodies are for other people to appreciate. Bodies are for other people to notice, judge, desire, and use. No. Your body is for you to inhabit and enjoy. Manipulating your body for the benefit of someone else–anyone else–is a slippery, slippery slope that ends in Bridalplasty.

Let me rewrite history and this ad campaign. How about the last line says: You might not have won, but at least you’ve been treating your body well. 

But that still leaves the beauty pageant issue…

Related Post: Why Hot Chicks of Occupy Wall Street is not cool.

Related Post: Real pageant contestants on evolution. Brace yourself.

5 Comments

Filed under Advertising, Body Image, Gender, Sports

Sunday Scraps 45

1. TIM: Interview with Tim Gunn in Mother Jones about his childhood, his It Gets Better spot, and consistently being the best thing about Project Runway.

2. PEGGY: Watch Peggy Orenstein (author of Cinderella Ate My Daughter) on Anderson Cooper’s day time show. She talks princess culture, hyper sexualization, you know… the usual stuff.

3. LAUNDRY: From Sociological Images, check out this store front display from UK store Bosch.

4. DREAM: A D.C. classroom of adorable children tag teams “I Have a Dream.” Even Gwen Ifill of PBS is moved.

5. HISTORY: Amazing photos from the Loving family (of Loving vs. Virginia, the case that ended interracial marriage bans). I’ve read so much about this case, but have never known what the namesakes looked like. Nothing like pictures to really contextualize a family’s love in the scope of political history.

6. BODY: A really moving, eloquent piece by Janell Burley Hofmann about what happened when her seven-year-old daughter saw herself in the mirror and declared that she was fat.

Related Post: Sunday 44 = booty call rules, tween feminism, Margaret Cho rocks.

Related Post: Sunday 43 = movie makeovers, Jimmy Fallon as Russell Brand, Private Danny Chen

2 Comments

Filed under Advertising, Body Image, Books, Education, Gender, Media

Popstars and Bridesmaids

My first “real” job was in an adorable little toy store in the heart of the pretty adorable town where I grew up. I learned to gift wrap anything (including, once, a hula hoop), but mostly we just played with the display versions of the latest board games.

To this day, I love a good toy store, and so I found myself browsing one recently for no other reason than to see what had changed since my heyday. This is what I found:

I didn’t realize that “popstars” had edged in on the venerable paper doll tradition, nor that bridesmaids was even part of the vernacular of little girls. And since when are bridesmaid dresses ever something anyone celebrates for their style?

I did a little digging after I got home, just to see whether this was all Usborne had to offer, or whether this particular toy store was just short-stocked on the non-Princess sticker books.

The subbrand is called Sticker Dolly Dressing, and there are 21 versions available. I was super pleased to see a “Dream Jobs” title featuring a doctor and an explorer of some sort, as well as a “Sports Girls.” The rest of the list was “Ballerinas,” “Ballerinas and Dolls,” “Dancers,” “Movie Stars,” “Popstars and Movie Stars,” “Weddings,” “Weddings and Bridesmaids,” “Princesses,” “Fairies,” “Princesses and Fairies,” and something called “Fancy Dress.”

Individually, none of these is particularly problematic. It’s not as if they have “Hot Mess,” “Reality TV Star,” or “Playboy Model.” But, collectively, the bottom line speaks with one voice, and it is saying “Be Pretty!” On the other hand, the boy stickers have “Pirates,” “Knights” and “Soldiers,” so maybe their message is “Be Violent!” Is that any better?

Related Post: How to buy toys for girls that don’t involve bustiers.

Related Post: The 1998 “Ruby” Campaign took the Barbie model in a different direction.

1 Comment

Filed under Gender